"Indiana Jones, PhD" (indianajonesphd)
09/05/2016 at 14:54 • Filed to: camaro, chevrolet, chevy, rs, make michigan great lake state again, photoshop | 3 | 7 |
What a mess, Chevy. I am so disappointed.
There. Much better :)
TheJWT
> Indiana Jones, PhD
09/05/2016 at 14:57 | 8 |
Here’s one I made earlier
citizennick
> Indiana Jones, PhD
09/05/2016 at 15:06 | 0 |
Great minds think alike.
boxrocket
> Indiana Jones, PhD
09/05/2016 at 15:36 | 1 |
It’s looked awful since the ‘60s, if we're honest. Even then, it looked like a Mustang knock-off. The firebird/trans am was always the better-looking of the twins.
Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
> Indiana Jones, PhD
09/05/2016 at 23:31 | 0 |
I disagree. It looks boring. So many other sport coupes look better. It looks like the cheap knock off of last generation.
Now I'm not saying it should look like a two door Malibu but come on. It's literally square!
Nauraushaun
> boxrocket
09/05/2016 at 23:38 | 0 |
This was a bad era. But the Firebird has been hideous at times as well (ie. 90s)
The Stig's former college room mate
> citizennick
09/06/2016 at 12:31 | 0 |
The last generation looked like they asked someone to draw a 69 Camaro from memory, having only seen it once for two minutes. The current one looks like they were allowed to look again for another minute.
Of the camaro/mustang/challenger, i think the best looking is the mustang, because they only took subtle styling cues from the classic cars, they didn’t try to modernize an old design. And i don’t like mustangs.
citizennick
> The Stig's former college room mate
09/06/2016 at 15:10 | 0 |
I'm with you, I think the Mustang flows and looks a bit better than the Camaro. I feel like they got to the rear and just ran out of inspiration (similar to the Cadillac CTS). But when you got a 5th & 6th gen side-by-side you can really tell they put a bit more effort into it.